• Home
  • RSS Feeds
  • Blog Archives
Subscribe to Disputing
Book an ADR Service
Call Karl Bayer
Karl Bayer's Disputing Blog - Mediator, Arbitrator, Court Master & Technical Advisor
About Karl  |  Book an ADR Service  |  Contact Karl   (214) 891-4505

Menu 
  • home
  • Mediation
  • Arbitration
  • Court Neutrals
  • Online Dispute Resolution
  • Technology
    • Intellectual Property
    • Privacy and Cybersecurity
    • E-discovery
  • Court Decisions
    • Texas Supreme Court
    • Fifth Circuit
    • Third Court of Appeals
    • U.S. Supreme Court
  • More
    • Legislation
      • Texas
      • United States
    • Healthcare
    • Guest Posts
      • John DeGroote
      • John C. Fleming
      • Rick Freeman
      • Professor Peter Friedman
      • Honorable W. Royal Furgeson, Jr.
      • James M. Gaitis
      • Laura A. Kaster
      • Professor John Lande
      • Philip J. Loree, Jr.
      • Michael McIlwrath
      • F. Peter Phillips
      • Professor Alan Scott Rau
      • Professor Thomas J. Stipanowich
      • Professor S.I. Strong
      • Richard Webb
      • Glen M. Wilkerson
    • International arbitration
    • Regulation
    • Sports and Entertainment


ABA Passes New Guidelines on the Appointment and Use of Special Masters

0
by Kyle Bailey

Tuesday, Mar 19, 2019


Tweet

At the January 2019 Midyear Meeting, the American Bar Association adopted the ABA Guidelines for the Appointment and Use of Special Masters in Federal and State Civil Litigation.  The new guidelines pinpoint two primary benefits of special masters. First, special masters can assist judges and magistrates with effective case management because special masters are able to focus their time on complex cases to a degree that judges with busy dockets cannot afford. The second main benefit of utilizing a special master is cost savings. Special masters often reduce costs by helping to not only avoid issues before they arise, but also efficiently resolve disputes that cannot be avoided.

One area that is highlighted by the ABA Guidelines is the ability for special masters with technical expertise to assist in technologically complex disputes. Specifically, the guidelines state that special masters, “Provid[e] technical advice and assistance for example in managing patent claim construction disputes in patent infringement litigation.”  Since no judge can be an expert in every subject matter that comes before the court, “Special masters who have specialized expertise in relevant fields can provide a practical resource to courts in cases that would benefit from subject-matter expertise.”

Despite these advantages, the appointment of a special master is still an underutilized form of dispute resolution. One of the main roadblocks currently preventing more widespread use of special masters is the absence of consistent procedures for their appointment and use. Therefore, the primary goal of the ABA Guidelines is to encourage increased awareness of the benefits related to the use of special masters and the development of standards for the appointment of special masters.

Overall, the guidelines recommend that courts, counsel, and parties be aware of the full range of functions a special master can perform and consider new ways special masters may be utilized. Legal practitioners should keep the ABA Guidelines in mind when engaging in complex disputes, especially in highly technical areas like intellectual property.

Photo by: Art Lasovsky on Unsplash

Related Posts

  • ABA Section of Intellectual Property | Complex Patent Suits: The Use of Special Masters for Claim ConstructionABA Section of Intellectual Property | Complex Patent Suits: The Use of Special Masters for Claim Construction
  • Arbitrating Patent DisputesArbitrating Patent Disputes
  • The Impact of Confidentiality on Reasonable Royalty Determinations in Patent DisputesThe Impact of Confidentiality on Reasonable Royalty Determinations in Patent Disputes
  • Interpreting the Scope of Exclusion-From-Arbitration Clauses in the IP Rights RealmInterpreting the Scope of Exclusion-From-Arbitration Clauses in the IP Rights Realm
  • SCOTUS Declines to Review $455 Million International Arbitration Award in Biotech Patent DisputeSCOTUS Declines to Review $455 Million International Arbitration Award in Biotech Patent Dispute
  • Special Masters: How to Help Judges Extend Their Reach… And Exceed Their GraspSpecial Masters: How to Help Judges Extend Their Reach… And Exceed Their Grasp

Like this article? Share it!


  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
    LinkedIn

  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window)
    X

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
    Facebook

  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
    Pinterest

  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
    Email
About Kyle Bailey

Kyle Bailey is a law clerk at Karl Bayer, Mediator, Arbitrator & Special Master. Kyle earned a J.D. from the University of Texas School of Law in 2020. Kyle received a B.S. from Rice University in 2015 where he studied computer science.

Legal Research

Legal Research

Connect with Disputing

Visit Us On LinkedinCheck Our Feed

About Disputing

Disputing is published by Karl Bayer, a dispute resolution expert based in Austin, Texas. Articles published on Disputing aim to provide original insight and commentary around issues related to arbitration, mediation and the alternative dispute resolution industry.

To learn more about Karl and his team, or to schedule a mediation or arbitration with Karl’s live scheduling calendar, visit www.karlbayer.com.

About Disputing

Disputing is published by Karl Bayer, a dispute resolution expert based in Austin, Texas. Articles published on Disputing aim to provide original insight and commentary around issues related to arbitration, mediation and the alternative dispute resolution industry.

To learn more about Karl and his team, or to schedule a mediation or arbitration with Karl’s live scheduling calendar, visit www.karlbayer.com.

Recent Posts

We're Back!!!!
Feb 24, 2025
JAMS Welcomes Karl Bayer to its Panel of Neutrals
JAMS Welcomes Karl Bayer to its Panel of Neutrals
May 28, 2024
Class Action Waivers in Arbitration Agreements: The Twenty-First Century Arbitration Battleground and Implications for the EU Countries
Nov 27, 2023

Featured Posts

Tips on Taking Good Remote Depositions From a Veteran Court Reporter

Online Mediation May Allow Restorative Justice to Continue During COVID-19

Remote Arbitration Best Practices: Witness Examination

Search

Legal Research

Legal Research


© 2025, Karl Bayer. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy