AT&T Mobility, LLC v. Concepcion | Blawgosphere Round-up on Class Arbitration Decision

On April 27, 2011, the U.S. Supreme Court decided AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion. The question presented was whether the FAA prohibits states from conditioning the enforceability of certain arbitration agreements on the availability of class-wide arbitration procedures.

We thought you would like to read some interesting commentary about the opinion:

• AT&T Mobility, LLC v. Concepcion: FAA preempts rule that makes class action waivers in arbitration agreements unenforceable, DLA Piper (May 2)
• GUEST-POST PART I | AT&T Mobility, LLC v. Concepcion and the Bright Side of the Force, Disputing (May 2)
• GUEST-POST PART II | AT&T Mobility, LLC v. Concepcion and the Bright Side of the Force, Disputing (May 2)
• Opinion analysis: What counts as arbitration, and who decides? SCOTUSblog (April 30)
• Arbitration Decision Suggests SCOTUS Majority Are Pro-Business More Than Jurisprudential Conservatives, Dorf on Law (April 29)
• AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion: Arbitration, Legal Fees and Class Actions, ADR Law (April 29)
• Seeking a Day in Court: When Litigants Reject Tenders of Damages, Business Conflict Blog (April 28)
• After AT&T Ruling, Should We Say Goodbye to Consumer Class Actions? The Wall Street Journal (April 27)
• Supreme Court Allows Contracts That Prohibit Class-Action Arbitration, The New York Times (April 27)
• Supreme Court Allows Companies to Opt Out of Class Actions, ADR Prof Blog (April 27)
• Continuing the Discussion of the AT&T v. Concepcion Decision: Implications for the future, ADR Prof Blog (April 27)
• Impact of Concepcion on Judicial Review of Arbitral Awards, ADR Prof Blog (April 27)
• Sternlight on AT&T v. Concepcion, ADR Prof Blog (April 27)
• Supremes Uphold Arbitral Class-Action Waivers, Workplace Prof Blog (April 27)
• Federal Arbitration Act preempts state law that made class action waiver unconscionable, LawMemo (April 27)

Technorati Tags: law, ADR, arbitration