Sergio Puig, Lecturer in Law and Teaching Fellow at the Stanford Program in International Legal Studies, has published Emergence and Dynamism in International Organizations: ICSID, Investor-State Arbitration, and International Investment Law, 44 Georgetown Journal of International Law 531 (2013). In his article, Mr. Puig discusses the nearly fifty-year history of the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID).
Here is the abstract:
Near the fiftieth anniversary of ICSID, the international organization of the World Bank Group specializing in international investment dispute settlement, the organization has become nearly synonymous with the field of international investment law. But how and why this confluence developed is a gap in the rich literature on ICSID. In an attempt to breach this gap, this article traces ICSID’s past and present, relying on a rich variety of sources with three broad objectives in mind: First, it offers a corrective to the prevailing view among international lawyers and le-gal scholars that ICSID is simply another arbitration facility and that its role in developing modern international investment law has been limited to enabling investor-State arbitration proceedings. Second, it provides evidence contradicting claims among practitioners and scholars that ICSID is experiencing an unprecedented crisis. Finally, it assesses the dynamics that have impacted ICSID’s emergence and long-term development with the broader aim of contributing to the theoretical understanding of the evolution of international organizations. The article reveals ICSID’s deep roots and far-reaching impact, and argues that while the challenges of the organization are serious and merit action, most are not unprecedented, and much can be learned from corrective measures taken in the past.
This and other scholarly articles authored by Mr. Puig may be downloaded without charge from the Social Science Research Network.
(Photo credit: By Aman Emoto from CANADA (Flickr) [CC-BY-2.0], via Wikimedia Commons)
Related Posts
The ICSID Conciliation Rules in Practice
Consistently Inconsistent: The Need for Predictability in Awarding Costs and Fees in Investment Treaty Arbitrations
Equal Contest of Arms, Jurisdictional Proof in Investor-State Arbitrations
Reviewing the Use of “Soft Law” in Investment Arbitration
How the Supreme Court’s Misconstruction of the FAA Has Affected Consumers
The Agreement to Arbitrate and the ‘Applicable Law’
