Disputing would like to invite you to read Liz Kramer’s recent blog post entitled “‘Older Workers’ Do Not Have To Arbitrate Statutory Employment Claim. ” In her post, Ms. Kramer discusses a series of articles regarding the fairness of arbitration clauses that were published by the New York Times earlier this month.
Ms. Kramer states:
With the far-reaching audience of the NYT, the policy questions surrounding waivers of class arbitration are no longer just a conversation among in-house counsel, advocates, and law professors, but reached the general water cooler set. For anyone passionate about arbitration law, it’s like Christmas morning. Jumping past the merits of the policy questions for a moment, what could happen if the public demands that its representatives take action?
You can read more about this and other timely alternative dispute resolution topics at Arbitration Nation.
Photo credit: Hernan Piñera / Foter.com / CC BY-SA
Related Posts
U.S. Supreme Court Denies Certiorari Petition in California Class Arbitration Case
NLRB Finds that Certain Arbitration Agreements Violate Federal Labor Law
Fifth Circuit Holds Class Arbitration is a Gateway Issue for the Courts to Decide
SCOTUS Holds Class Arbitration Must be Explicitly Provided for in Agreement
SEC Issues No-Action Letter Over Shareholder’s Mandatory Arbitration Proposal
Seventh Circuit Sides With Sister Courts in Holding Availability of Class Arbitration is a Question of Arbitrability for the Courts to Decide
