On Monday, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in a published opinion that a class action waiver included in an employer’s mandatory arbitration agreement violated the National Labor Relations Act (“NLRA”) and California law.
Continue reading...Texas attorneys who are interested in learning more about how to handle disputes with clients using arbitration are encouraged to tune in to an upcoming Texas Bar CLE live webcast on August 25th from 2-3 pm CST.
Continue reading...The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit has once again rejected a National Labor Relations Board’s (“NLRB”) order stating a class action waiver included in an agreement to arbitrate violates the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA).
Continue reading...Rutgers Law School Assistant Professor David L. Noll has published “Regulating Arbitration,” California Law Review, Forthcoming.
Continue reading...Texas’ Twelfth District Court of Appeals in Tyler has ruled that a nonsignatory spouse may not be bound by an arbitration agreement his wife entered into with her employer.
Continue reading...Apple and Psystar have agreed to a private ADR session to attempt a resolution to the ongoing lawsuit filed by Apple. It appears they opted out of the court-provided ADR options for a private mediation service. Psystar is a Florida corporation that has received some level of attention over a recent website that sold custom-built computers with Apple’s OS X operating system installed. Such setups, PCs running Macintosh operating systems, are often dubbed “Mac Clones.” Apple places legal restrictions on its software with a license agreement stating that OS X should only be run on its proprietary hardware. Psystar argues that such restrictions are unenforceable and countersued. It does strike me as strange that anyone can walk into an Apple Store and purchase a copy of OS X, but then would be restricted from installing it on their PC. Indeed, that’s what Psystar was doing – telling its customers that if they purchased OS X, Psystar would install it on the PC for free. They argue their process was an end-around the license agreement. This is a great look at the advantages of ADR, and a classic case for its usefulness. Psystar is a small company that probably doesn’t want to engage in a drawn out litigation with a monster like Apple, and the last thing Apple wants is a court opinion holding its user license agreement unenforceable. By choosing private mediation, the parties may be able to reach a private settlement that would allow Psystar to cut its losses (or even take home some winnings), and let Apple resolve the issue without showing a chink in its armor. This should be interesting as it develops. The initial report: http://www.macobserver.com/article/2008/10/16.9.shtml Another article, which contains a link to the full ADR agreement: http://news.cnet.com/8301-13579_3-10068824-37.html?part=rss A few more articles on the suit: (July) http://news.cnet.com/8301-13860_3-9991572-56.html?tag=mncol;txt (May) http://news.cnet.com/8301-13579_3-9933896-37.html?tag=mncol;txt
Continue reading...Disputing is published by Karl Bayer, a dispute resolution expert based in Austin, Texas. Articles published on Disputing aim to provide original insight and commentary around issues related to arbitration, mediation and the alternative dispute resolution industry.
To learn more about Karl and his team, or to schedule a mediation or arbitration with Karl’s live scheduling calendar, visit www.karlbayer.com.
Disputing is published by Karl Bayer, a dispute resolution expert based in Austin, Texas. Articles published on Disputing aim to provide original insight and commentary around issues related to arbitration, mediation and the alternative dispute resolution industry.
To learn more about Karl and his team, or to schedule a mediation or arbitration with Karl’s live scheduling calendar, visit www.karlbayer.com.