During 2012, the U.S. Supreme Court decided several cases related to arbitration: On January 10, 2012, the U.S. Supreme Court handed down CompuCredit Corporation v. Greenwood. The issue in CompuCredit was whether claims under the Credit Repair Organizations Act are subject to arbitration. The Court held that because the Credit Repair Organizations Act is silent on whether claims can proceed in an arbitrable forum, the Federal Arbitration Act requires the arbitration agreement to be enforced according to its terms. On January 23, 2012, Petitioner Christopher Wanken filed a writ of certiorari (Docket No. 11-939) with the U.S. Supreme Court against Respondents Raymond James Financial Services, Inc. and its branch manager, John Dwight Wanken, seeking review of the Fifth Circuit decision on Wanken v. Wanken, No. 11-102219, 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 20014 (5th Cir. Tex. Sept. 29, 2011). The petition was denied on April 13, 2012. Read more. On February 21, 2012, the U.S. Supreme Court reversed and remanded orders of the Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia which held unenforceable all predispute arbitration agreements that apply to claims alleging personal injury or wrongful death against nursing homes. See Marmet Health Care Center, Inc., et al. v. Clayton Brown, et al., Case Nos. 11–391 and 11–394, 565 U. S. ____ (Feb. 21, 2012). Read more. On November 9, 2012, the U.S. Supreme Court agreed to hearAmerican Express Co. v. Italian Colors Restaurant (Docket No. 12-133). The issue is whether the Federal Arbitration Act permits courts, invoking the “federal substantive law of arbitrability,” to invalidate arbitration agreements on the ground that they do not permit class arbitration of a federal-law claim. Read more. On November 26, 2012, in Nitro-Lift Technologies, L.L.C. v. Eddie Lee Howard, et al, 568 U.S. ___ (Nov. 26, 2012), the U.S. Supreme Court vacated an Oklahoma Supreme Court decision because the decision ignored a basic tenet of the Federal Arbitration Act (“FAA”) and did not allow the arbitrator to rule on the validity of the contracts. Read more. On December 7, 2012, the U.S. Supreme Court granted certiorari to Oxford Health Plans LLC v. Sutter (Docket No. 12-135). In the case below, Sutter v. Oxford Health Plans LLC, 675 F.3d 215 (3d Cir. N.J. 2012) the Third Circuit had held that that a party could not be compelled under the Federal Arbitration Act, to submit to class arbitration unless there was a contractual basis for concluding that the parties agreed to do so. Read more. Stay tuned!
Continue reading...Continuing our 2012 Year-End Highlights, we present today our top healthcare posts: 1. Medical Mediator 2. Ethical Intelligence in Conflict Engagement 3. Conflict Management in U.S. Hospitals 4. Is ADR Effective in Healthcare? 5. Elder Healthcare Conflict Stay tuned!
Continue reading...We are happy to share our featured articles for 2012: Class and Collective Relief in the Cross-Border Context: A Possible Role for the Permanent Court of Arbitration Ten Hallmarks of Effective Arbitration Agreements with Sovereigns and State Entities The New 2012 ICC Arbitration Rules International Arbitration and the Republic of Colombia: Commercial, Comparative and Constitutional Concerns From a U.S. Perspective The Arbitration Fairness Index: Using a Public Rating System to Skirt the Legal Logjam and Promote Fairer and More Effective Arbitration of Employment and Consumer Disputes The Errors of Comity: Forum Non Conveniens Returns to the Second Circuit Empowering Settlors: How Proper Language Can Increase the Enforceability of a Mandatory Arbitration Provision in a Trust Navigating the Borders Between International Commercial Arbitration and U.S. Federal Courts: A Jurisprudential GPS Border Skirmishes: The Intersection Between Litigation and International Commercial Arbitration An Empirical Study of Predispute Mandatory Arbitration Clauses in Social Media Terms of Service Agreements Arbitration of environmental disputes Mass Procedures in Abaclat v. Argentine Republic: Are They Consistent with the International Investment Regime? Mandatory Arbitration of Internal Trust Disputes: Improving Arbitrability and Enforceability Through Proper Procedural Choices National Roundtable on Consumer and Employment Dispute Resolution: Consumer Arbitration Roundtable Summary Report Recent Supreme Court Arbitration Rulings Affect Employment and Class Action Arbitrations Mass Procedures as a Form of ‘Regulatory Arbitration’ | Abaclat v. Argentine Republic and the International Investment Regime Does Class Arbitration ‘Change the Nature’ of Arbitration? Stolt-Nielsen, AT&T and a Return to First Principles What Constitutes an ‘Agreement in Writing’ in International Commercial Arbitration? Conflicts Between the New York Convention and the Federal Arbitration Act Monism and Dualism in International Commercial Arbitration: Overcoming Barriers to Consistent Application of Principles of Public International Law Stay tuned for more 2012 Year-End Highlights!
Continue reading...Happy New Year from Disputing! We are pleased to share with you our 10 most popular blog posts of 2012: 1. USADA Case against Lance Armstrong | USADA Adjudication Process Part IV | The Arbitration Hearing (Jul. 25, 2012) 2. USADA Case against Lance Armstrong | USADA Adjudication Process Part I | USADA ‘Results Management’ (Jul. 19, 2012) 3. USADA Case against Lance Armstrong | USADA Adjudication Process Part III | The Appointment of Arbitrators (Jul. 24, 2012) 4. USADA Case against Lance Armstrong | USADA Adjudication Process Part VI | Right to Appeal to the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) (Jul. 30, 2012) 5. Rhode Island Supreme Court Okays Unauthorized Practice of Law by Non-lawyer in a Labor Arbitration (Mar. 21, 2012) 6. Armstrong v. Tygart | Austin Federal Court Dismisses Lance Armstrong Lawsuit Against USADA (Aug. 20, 2012) 7. USADA Case against Lance Armstrong | USADA Allegations (Jul. 13, 2012) 8. USADA Case against Lance Armstrong | USADA Adjudication Process Part II | The Review Board Track (Jul. 23, 2012) 9. USADA Case against Lance Armstrong | USADA’s Successful Arbitration Track Record (Aug. 1, 2012) 10. USADA Case against Lance Armstrong | What is the USADA? (Jul. 16, 2012)
Continue reading...Disputing is published by Karl Bayer, a dispute resolution expert based in Austin, Texas. Articles published on Disputing aim to provide original insight and commentary around issues related to arbitration, mediation and the alternative dispute resolution industry.
To learn more about Karl and his team, or to schedule a mediation or arbitration with Karl’s live scheduling calendar, visit www.karlbayer.com.
Disputing is published by Karl Bayer, a dispute resolution expert based in Austin, Texas. Articles published on Disputing aim to provide original insight and commentary around issues related to arbitration, mediation and the alternative dispute resolution industry.
To learn more about Karl and his team, or to schedule a mediation or arbitration with Karl’s live scheduling calendar, visit www.karlbayer.com.