In response to criticism that international arbitration is becoming as time consuming and costly as U.S. litigation, (read ABA article here) several arbitration associations have published guidelines recently: The International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) Commission on Arbitration published a 2007 report entitled “Techniques for Controlling Time and Costs in Arbitration.” (available here) The report covers guidelines for the creation of the arbitration agreement, selection of arbitrator, preliminary procedural issues, as well as subsequent procedural issues. The International Centre for Dispute Resolution (ICDR), the international arm of the American Arbitration Association promulgated in 2008 its “ICDR Guidelines for Arbitrators Concerning Exchanges of Information.” (available here) The guidelines provide that “while arbitration must be a fair process, care must also be taken to prevent the importation of procedural measures and devices from different court systems, which may be considered conducive to fairness within those systems, but which are not appropriate to the conduct of arbitrations in an international context and which are inconsistent with an alternative form of dispute resolution that is simpler, less expensive, and more expeditious.” Under the guidelines, the only documents to be exchanged are those on which a party relies. The Chartered Institute of Arbitrators issued its “Protocol for E-Disclosure in Arbitration” in 2008. (available here). The protocol’s purpose is to focus early consideration upon disclosure of electronically stored information. The CPR International Institute for Conflict Prevention & Resolution issued in 2009 its “Global Rules for Accelerated Commercial Arbitration” which when agreed by the parties, provides for one neutral with significant new powers to control discovery and requires rendering the award within six (6) months of the selection of the Arbitral Tribunal. (available here) The International Bar Association (IBA) published in 2009 a draft form of its “IBA Guidelines for Drafting International Arbitration Clauses.” (available here) The guidelines provide helpful comments and sample arbitration clauses. The Dispute Resolution Section of the New York State Bar Association published its “Report on Arbitration Discovery in Domestic Commercial Cases” in 2009. (available here) Despite its domestic focus, the recommendations are also helpful to international arbitrators. The objective of the report was to issue some guidelines of use to counsel and arbitrators to best handle the unpredictability issue of discovery proceedings in arbitration. The report provides ten precepts to help enable arbitrators to control the discovery process: (1) Good Judgment of the Arbitrator, (2) Early Attention to Discovery by the Arbitrator, (3) Party Preferences, (4) E-discovery, (5) Legal Considerations, (6) Arbitrator Tools (7) Artfully Drafted Arbitration Clauses, (8) Depositions, (9) Discovery Disputes, and (10) Discovery & Other Procedural Aspects of Arbitration. Technorati Tags: law, ADR, arbitration
Continue reading...We thought that you might like to watch the video of Jim Melamed’s acceptance (on behalf of Mediate.com) of the ABA Problem Solver of the Year Award on April 9 at the ABA ADR Section Conference in San Francisco. (read more about the award here). Technorati Tags: ADR, law, arbitration
Continue reading...The International Bar Association (IBA) recently published in draft form its IBA Guidelines for Drafting International Arbitration Clauses. (available here) The Task Force is seeking comments on the proposed new Guidelines. Comments should be sent via email before June 1, 2010 to the IBA at divisions@int-bar.org. (read more here ) On a related note, an IBA arbitration subcommittee has developed a new version of the 1999 IBA Rules on the Taking of Evidence in International Commercial Arbitration. The revised version has been submitted for approval in March 2010. (download the proposed version here) Technorati Tags: ADR, law, arbitration
Continue reading...Mark your Calendars! The Texas Bar CLE presents the 23rd Annual Advanced Evidence and Discovery course, co-sponsored by the Litigation Section of the State Bar of Texas. The live conference will take place in San Antonio on May 20-21. Video conference will be available in Dallas on June 24-25 and Houston on July 8-9. This course will provide discussions on the following topics: • The Practice of Law in the Information Age: How to Survive and Flourish • Authenticating Tweets • The Deposition of Corporate Representatives • Parallel Criminal and Civil Cases • Discovery Issues in Arbitration Karl Bayer will be presenting the section on Arbitration on May 21st. Find the brochure here and register for the course here. Technorati Tags: ADR, law, arbitration
Continue reading...Disputing is published by Karl Bayer, a dispute resolution expert based in Austin, Texas. Articles published on Disputing aim to provide original insight and commentary around issues related to arbitration, mediation and the alternative dispute resolution industry.
To learn more about Karl and his team, or to schedule a mediation or arbitration with Karl’s live scheduling calendar, visit www.karlbayer.com.
Disputing is published by Karl Bayer, a dispute resolution expert based in Austin, Texas. Articles published on Disputing aim to provide original insight and commentary around issues related to arbitration, mediation and the alternative dispute resolution industry.
To learn more about Karl and his team, or to schedule a mediation or arbitration with Karl’s live scheduling calendar, visit www.karlbayer.com.