• Home
  • RSS Feeds
  • Blog Archives
Subscribe to Disputing
Book an ADR Service
Call Karl Bayer
Karl Bayer's Disputing Blog - Mediator, Arbitrator, Court Master & Technical Advisor
About Karl  |  Book an ADR Service  |  Contact Karl   (214) 891-4505

Menu 
  • home
  • Mediation
  • Arbitration
  • Court Neutrals
  • Online Dispute Resolution
  • Technology
    • Intellectual Property
    • Privacy and Cybersecurity
    • E-discovery
  • Court Decisions
    • Texas Supreme Court
    • Fifth Circuit
    • Third Court of Appeals
    • U.S. Supreme Court
  • More
    • Legislation
      • Texas
      • United States
    • Healthcare
    • Guest Posts
      • John DeGroote
      • John C. Fleming
      • Rick Freeman
      • Professor Peter Friedman
      • Honorable W. Royal Furgeson, Jr.
      • James M. Gaitis
      • Laura A. Kaster
      • Professor John Lande
      • Philip J. Loree, Jr.
      • Michael McIlwrath
      • F. Peter Phillips
      • Professor Alan Scott Rau
      • Professor Thomas J. Stipanowich
      • Professor S.I. Strong
      • Richard Webb
      • Glen M. Wilkerson
    • International arbitration
    • Regulation
    • Sports and Entertainment


Remote Arbitration Best Practices: Security and Confidentiality

0
by Kyle Bailey

Tuesday, May 12, 2020


Tweet

Disputing is synthesizing guidance documents from the AAA, CIArb, CPR, Hogan Lovells, and the ICC, as well as the Seoul Protocol, to provide a comprehensive list of best practices for remote arbitration. The series started with a post on technology best practices.

Today’s post focuses on security and confidentiality best practices for using video conferencing and file sharing services:

  • Virtual proceedings should have a unique meeting identifier on the video conferencing platform, rather than an ID that is used more than once. The virtual proceeding should be password protected and the password should be distributed separately from the meeting invitation.
  • Participants shall use secure internet connections, such as a wired network connection or a secured Wi-Fi network. Participants can also utilize a virtual private network. Wired networks are recommended over Wi-Fi connections because wired connections offer a more reliable connection. Public Wi-Fi connections should be avoided.
  • All participants shall be disclosed prior to the virtual proceeding. Only disclosed participants will be invited to the proceeding and will be allowed access. Video conferencing platforms have multiple tools to ensure only authorized participants are allowed in a virtual meeting, including waiting rooms and the ability to lock a meeting once all authorized participants have joined.
  • The parties and the tribunal must decide whether the proceeding will be recorded and designate an individual to record the proceeding. No other participant may take a recording or screenshot of the proceeding.
  • The parties should agree on a secure document sharing platform for the distribution of exhibits and other electronic documentation.
  • The parties should consider the level of encryption offered by video conferencing and document sharing platforms before choosing an appropriate platform.
  • Ultimately, the parties, counsel, and tribunal must do due diligence to ensure that any platform used for the virtual arbitration offers sufficient security and confidentiality protections.

 

If you would like to discuss remote arbitration further, please contact Karl’s scheduling team at (512) 345-8537. Information on the technology, security, and confidentiality procedures for online dispute resolution used by Karl can be found here.

Photo by: freestocks on Unsplash

Related Posts

  • El Paso COA Holds Arbitration Agreement Was Not Illusory in Workplace Accident CaseEl Paso COA Holds Arbitration Agreement Was Not Illusory in Workplace Accident Case
  • IBA Mediation Committee Publishes Rules for Investor-State MediationIBA Mediation Committee Publishes Rules for Investor-State Mediation
  • Texas Supreme Court Hears Case on Standards of Judicial Review for Arbitration Awards After Hall StreetTexas Supreme Court Hears Case on Standards of Judicial Review for Arbitration Awards After Hall Street
  • U.S. Arbitration and Mediation Legislative UpdateU.S. Arbitration and Mediation Legislative Update
  • Is a Mediator Like a Bus? How Legal Ethics May Inform the Question of Case Discrimination by MediatorsIs a Mediator Like a Bus? How Legal Ethics May Inform the Question of Case Discrimination by Mediators
  • NCTDR Publishes ODR Bibliography NCTDR Publishes ODR Bibliography 

Like this article? Share it!


  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
    LinkedIn

  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window)
    X

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
    Facebook

  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
    Pinterest

  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
    Email
About Kyle Bailey

Kyle Bailey is a law clerk at Karl Bayer, Mediator, Arbitrator & Special Master. Kyle earned a J.D. from the University of Texas School of Law in 2020. Kyle received a B.S. from Rice University in 2015 where he studied computer science.

Legal Research

Legal Research

Connect with Disputing

Visit Us On LinkedinCheck Our Feed

About Disputing

Disputing is published by Karl Bayer, a dispute resolution expert based in Austin, Texas. Articles published on Disputing aim to provide original insight and commentary around issues related to arbitration, mediation and the alternative dispute resolution industry.

To learn more about Karl and his team, or to schedule a mediation or arbitration with Karl’s live scheduling calendar, visit www.karlbayer.com.

About Disputing

Disputing is published by Karl Bayer, a dispute resolution expert based in Austin, Texas. Articles published on Disputing aim to provide original insight and commentary around issues related to arbitration, mediation and the alternative dispute resolution industry.

To learn more about Karl and his team, or to schedule a mediation or arbitration with Karl’s live scheduling calendar, visit www.karlbayer.com.

Recent Posts

We're Back!!!!
Feb 24, 2025
JAMS Welcomes Karl Bayer to its Panel of Neutrals
JAMS Welcomes Karl Bayer to its Panel of Neutrals
May 28, 2024
Class Action Waivers in Arbitration Agreements: The Twenty-First Century Arbitration Battleground and Implications for the EU Countries
Nov 27, 2023

Featured Posts

Tips on Taking Good Remote Depositions From a Veteran Court Reporter

Online Mediation May Allow Restorative Justice to Continue During COVID-19

Remote Arbitration Best Practices: Witness Examination

Search

Legal Research

Legal Research


© 2025, Karl Bayer. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy