Last week, the U.S. Supreme Court denied cert to Nafta Traders, Inc. v. Quinn, 339 S.W.3d 84 (Tex. 2011). In Nafta Traders, the Texas Supreme Court had held that the Federal Arbitration Act (“FAA”) did not preempt enforcement of an agreement for expanded judicial review of an arbitration award enforceable under the Texas Arbitration Act (“TAA”). Such enforcement was consistent with the FAA’s purpose of ensuring that private arbitration agreements were enforced according to their terms. See Texas Supreme Court Declines to Follow Hall Street in Arbitration Case: Nafta Traders, Inc. v. Quinn, May 13, 2011.
Technorati Tags:
Related Posts
Texas Supreme Court Declines to Follow Hall Street in Arbitration Case: Nafta Traders, Inc. v. Quinn
U.S. Supreme Court Vacates Oklahoma Supreme Court: FAA Statue Prevails over Oklahoma State
2011 Arbitration Case Law | Texas Supreme Court
2011 Arbitration Case Law | U.S. Supreme Court
2010 Arbitration Case Law: Texas Supreme Court
Texas Supreme Court Holds Agreement to Arbitrate is Not Substantively Unconscionable Despite Unenforceable Provisions
