[UPDATE: Read professor Thomas J. Stipanowich’s comments about the case here and professor S.I. Strong’s here.]
Today, the U.S. Supreme Court handed down its decision on Stolt-Nielsen v. AnimalFeeds. The Court’s decision may be downloaded here. The Court held that “”Imposing class arbitration on parties who have not agreed to authorize class arbitration is inconsistent with the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA), 9 U. S. C. §1 et seq. “
We will post a summary of the opinion once we read it.
Related Posts
Stolt-Nielsen v. AnimalFeeds | Blawgosphere Roundup on Class Action Arbitration Case
GUEST-POST | Stolt-Nielsen Opens More Doors Than It Closes
The Future of Class Arbitration Part I
U.S. Supreme Court Grants Certiorari to Yet Another Class Arbitration Case
GUEST-POST PART III | States’ Rights, Big Business and the Nature of Arbitration: AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion
Article | Unresolved Questions in the Wake of the U.S. Supreme Court’s Class Arbitration Ruling in Stolt-Nielsen v. AnimalFeeds International
